#Bitcasa corporate full#

However, in the case of alternatives to Bitcasa, we took care to look for providers that sported similar if not superior features, to ensure that former Bitcasa users will have as smooth a transition to a new Cloud as possible. Here at BestBackups, we choose our top providers based on their security, range and usability of features, value for money, customer service, and overall performance.

Visit CrashPlan » Our Bitcasa Alternatives Criteria Find out more about it by clicking on the link below!

That said, if it’s inexpensive and expansive storage that you’re after, then you won’t be disappointed by switching over from the Bitcasa Cloud to CrashPlan. The only reason we put CrashPlan a little lower on the list for Bitcasa alternatives is that, like Backblaze, it lacks integrated file sharing, which can be a deal breaker for some users. This makes Crashplan another good option for consumers who miss the days of pre-2014 Bitcasa. (Trend Micro once offered unlimited storage for its SafeSync storage plans, but as a limited-time promotion.CrashPlan’s offsite backup shares a lot of the perks of Backblaze, down to the unlimited storage space, excellent security and cheap plans ($59.00 per year for personal backup). “Part of the implied understanding as the user of these services is that if I store my data with a cloud storage provider, they’re not going to be rummaging through the content of these files,” says Mark Nunnikhoven, Trend Micro’s vice president of cloud research. Customers didn’t seem very willing to pay more–20 bucks, 30 bucks, whatever–for unlimited service. But doing so would involve looking at the actual files, which would be a breach of privacy and may not even be possible if the data is encrypted. If a user with an unlimited consumer-grade plan is backing up their business servers or running a homegrown streaming video service, the provider should be able to shut that down. One particularly messy issue for storage providers is that they can’t weed out legitimate high-volume uses from those that violate their terms of service. Unlimited is supposed to mean unlimited, and any attempts to discourage that kind of use looks like a betrayal. But it’s also not a problem that’s easily solved.

“The abusers thing, it’s a loaded word, and it bears asking questions around exactly what constitutes abuse,” he says.īesides, explanation never sits well with users, as it suggests they’re being punished for the actions of a few. Taptich now admits that it’s a tricky problem to address. Bitcasa blamed the demise of unlimited on “the growing number of suspected abusers” along with weak demand from everyone else. Microsoft, for instance, noted that some users were exceeding 75TB of storage, or 14,000 times the average. Instead, they point a finger at the heaviest users for making the service unsustainable.

#Bitcasa corporate full#

When cloud storage providers give up on unlimited, they tend to avoid taking the full blame. It’s anybody’s guess what the next technological leap might be, but providers of unlimited storage would be wise to have contingency plans in place. Around the time Mozy switched to tiered storage plans, usage was tripling or quadrupling on a yearly basis, compared to 15% or 20% yearly growth in Mozy’s early days. “Just the amount of information that consumers were accumulating and storing skyrocketed,” says Dave Robinson, Mozy’s head of marketing.